Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Showing 251-300 from the Supabase archive
Jul 4, 2019

@Rec1pr0city Active safety will continue to improve via over-the-air software updates. Since all Tesla cars are connected, we analyze each accident & do our best to minimize probability of recurrence.

1.3K likes93 RT50 replies
Jul 4, 2019

@gagansachdev4 Best crash safety system is not crashing in the first place. Makes a world of difference for pedestrians & cyclists especially.

1.3K likes75 RT42 replies
Jul 4, 2019

Reason for top rating is that active steering & braking safety features of Tesla Autopilot are turned on no cost for all cars https://t.co/HBKwAEbgc9 https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-model-3-can-survive-crash-avoid-one-too/

10.5K likes882 RT379 replies
Mar 10, 2019

@DJSnM @RocketTenor @NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew For cargo missions, propulsive land landing should be no problem. Doesn’t have same safety criticality as crew.

2.1K likes93 RT73 replies
Mar 10, 2019

@NASA @SpaceX @Space_Station @Commercial_Crew Dragon 2 was designed to land using thrusters, with parachutes as backup. Switched to chutes as primary, due to difficulty of proving safety, but Dragon can still do it. https://t.co/Mr7VFIQwWf https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=07Pm8ZY0XJI

12.2K likes762 RT313 replies
Jan 23, 2019

@teslamodel3fan @Tesla Since it’s part of safety & security, all cars with AP2+ hardware will get it

1.8K likes75 RT83 replies
Dec 20, 2018

@ElSchumi @FredericLambert @boringcompany Passive lateral safety is required by regulators & I think they’re right. Might be able to build this into the tunnel wall though. So long as the vehicle is prevented by physics from rolling or jackknifing, there is probably a good safety argument.

423 likes21 RT14 replies
Dec 20, 2018

A variety of vehicles, like normal roads, from a small car to a densely seated bus. Must be seated & belted for high speed safety.

8.5K likes338 RT113 replies
Dec 5, 2018

@DJSnM Pump is single string. Some landing systems are not redundant, as landing is considered ground safety critical, but not mission critical. Given this event, we will likely add a backup pump & lines.

3.5K likes259 RT112 replies
Nov 29, 2018

After safety, our goal is to make a Tesla the most fun you could possibly have in a car

17.5K likes845 RT617 replies
Nov 9, 2018

@mihk101 Agreed, top priority for Autopilot team. Being cautious for max safety.

908 likes27 RT51 replies
Nov 1, 2018

@raxetul We can make it work from very far away. LoS is just for safety.

945 likes25 RT28 replies
Oct 27, 2018

@officialjaden Yes. Will require tapping indicator to confirm at first. When safety looks good after 10M miles of driving or so, there will be an option to turn off confirm.

7.7K likes327 RT84 replies
Oct 23, 2018

@cleantechnica Model 3 body design could def be less complex, but, yes, most of weight difference is due to higher safety vs other cars

5.5K likes218 RT134 replies
Oct 8, 2018

The physics of how Tesla achieved best safety of any cars ever tested. Note, when vehicle weight is taken into account, order is more like X,S, then 3, but they are all very close.

23.3K likes2.6K RT779 replies
Sep 20, 2018

@LanceUlanoff Key technical point is that the polar moment of inertia (concentration of mass around center) of a Tesla, to the extent of our knowledge, is better than any other production car. This positively affects safety, handling & driving feel. Extremely important metric.

1.1K likes83 RT31 replies
Sep 20, 2018

Tesla piece on the physics of car safety coming soon for those interested in technical details

11.5K likes592 RT338 replies
Sep 20, 2018

.@NHTSAgov will post final safety probability stats soon. Model 3 has a shot at being safest car ever tested.

15.5K likes1.3K RT407 replies
Jul 31, 2018

Not having a big gas guzzler engine in front means there’s room for trunks in front & back, plus longer crumple zone for best safety of any midsize car

14.9K likes1.1K RT484 replies
Jun 27, 2018

@Penenberg For sure! When doing US govt crash safety testing, the Model S roof was so strong, it broke their testing machine. https://t.co/m9Ae9mhRIC https://www.wired.com/2013/08/tesla-model-s-crash-test/

10.0K likes1.3K RT202 replies
Jun 25, 2018

@DMC_Ryan @tkraenze @Tesla Critical autonomous safety features like emergency braking are standard, but convenience features like active cruise control are not

388 likes13 RT16 replies
Jun 10, 2018

@raptorweb Sigh. This is crux of matter: can’t make system too annoying or people won’t use it, negatively affecting safety, but also can’t allow people to get too complacent or safety again suffers. Latest update should have a positive effect on latter issue especially.

506 likes19 RT65 replies
Jun 10, 2018

@anandrajk @lexiheft @Tesla That issue is better in latest Autopilot software rolling out now & fully fixed in August update as part of our long-awaited Tesla Version 9. To date, Autopilot resources have rightly focused entirely on safety. With V9, we will begin to enable full self-driving features.

905 likes126 RT77 replies
May 25, 2018

@chick_in_kiev @evepeyser @broderick Pravda was incorporated a year ago. Also, Tesla factory safety has improved every year & is now better than industry avg. Misleading articles refer to Tesla being worse than avg in 2015 when we were just figuring things out.

956 likes36 RT42 replies
May 22, 2018

@mikeyfranklin @dmatkins137 @ShayneRarma @NASA More “Reveal” bs. Tesla is overseen by Cal/OSHA, most stringent labor safety org in US, & they’ve never found us to misrepresent. On other hand, Ford, Chrysler & GM (UAW) have repeatedly been found to fake safety numbers. Strangely, that info is missing from Reveal article …

567 likes43 RT23 replies
May 22, 2018

@rrosenbl @ElectrekCo @FredericLambert @Tesla Have been meaning to get around to talking to him. Some of his criticisms are valid, but, on the higher body/chassis weight front, he wasn’t fully appreciating that we were going for much higher crash safety levels than other cars.

565 likes28 RT16 replies
May 21, 2018

@dmatkins137 @ShayneRarma @NASA Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union. Could do so tmrw if they wanted. But why pay union dues & give up stock options for nothing? Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare.

2.7K likes279 RT357 replies
May 14, 2018

@TalkTesla @Techmeme @timkhiggins According to NHTSA, there was an automotive fatality every 86M miles in 2017 (~40,000 deaths). Tesla was every 320M miles. It’s not possible to be zero, but probability of fatality is much lower in a Tesla. We will be reporting updated safety numbers after each quarter.

3.7K likes585 RT98 replies
Apr 2, 2018

@TeslaMotorsClub Lot of respect for NTSB, but NHTSA regulates cars, not NTSB, which is an advisory body. Tesla releases critical crash data affecting public safety immediately & always will. To do otherwise would be unsafe.

4.8K likes321 RT81 replies
Mar 25, 2018

@ElectrekCo I have just asked our team to slow down deliveries. It is clear that we are exceeding the local logistics capacity due to batch build and delivery. Customer happiness & safety matter more than a few extra cars this quarter.

8.0K likes391 RT189 replies
Feb 28, 2018

Higher safety & environmental requirements & labor costs explain only a small part of the difference. True root cause imo is an exponential growth in bureaucracy & a self-serving private sector consultant industry earning a % on project cost, incenting them to maximize cost.

13.3K likes1.5K RT360 replies
Nov 20, 2017

Not saying the next gen Roadster special upgrade package *will* definitely enable it to fly short hops, but maybe … Certainly possible. Just a question of safety. Rocket tech applied to a car opens up revolutionary possibilities.

29.5K likes5.1K RT1.2K replies
Aug 31, 2017

@GigarothPack Not a bad idea. For sure, it makes sense to test AI for safety in some kind of open world / sandbox virtual world.

2.0K likes117 RT138 replies
Aug 12, 2017

If you're not concerned about AI safety, you should be. Vastly more risk than North Korea. https://t.co/2z0tiid0lc

29.3K likes10.1K RT1.8K replies
May 23, 2017

@douglasprest Can be set higher than that for highways, but limited to +5mph or +8km/h off highway (true avg drive speed) for pedestrian & cyclist safety

142 likes7 RT6 replies
May 1, 2017

Winds aloft are unusually high (still within structural safety bounds). Worrying, but not a showstopper. https://t.co/epHQQvajOZ https://x.com/spacex/status/859000342985424896

4.1K likes508 RT174 replies
Jan 24, 2017

@stephenstohn Yes, safety should improve significantly due to autonomy features, even if regs disallow no driver present

340 likes27 RT12 replies
Nov 4, 2016

@BitterMercy Excellent safety in rollover (5 star+). That was what took so long to develop.

305 likes20 RT7 replies
Nov 4, 2016

In addition, we reinforced the surrounding body structure for improved safety (was already 5 star in all categories).

3.0K likes376 RT137 replies
Jul 15, 2016

EU regulators find no safety concerns with Autopilot https://t.co/zOykm4XeHP http://electrek.co/2016/07/14/european-authority-tesla-autopilot-after-beta-scare/

2.7K likes872 RT110 replies
Jul 13, 2016

We don't mind taking the heat for customer safety. It is the right thing to do. From @RoadandTrack https://t.co/D181ui1jB0 http://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/news/a29944/leave-tesla-alone/

4.2K likes1.4K RT200 replies
Jun 11, 2016

Would seem to indicate that one or more people sought to create the false impression of a safety issue where none existed. Q is why?

2.3K likes516 RT550 replies
Jun 11, 2016

NHTSA confirmed today that they found no safety concern with the Model S suspension and have no further need for data from us on this matter

4.1K likes1.2K RT135 replies
Apr 1, 2016

@redletterdave Hardware in all cars. Autopilot safety features standard. Convenience features optional (like S and X).

254 likes48 RT18 replies
Apr 23, 2015

@bonnienorman New Roadster battery should complete safety validation by end of July, so likely available in August

134 likes49 RT26 replies
Jan 15, 2015

Funding research on artificial intelligence safety. It's all fun & games until someone loses an I http://t.co/t1aGnrTU21 http://futureoflife.org/misc/AI

1.4K likes1.0K RT156 replies
Jan 11, 2015

World's top artificial intelligence developers sign open letter calling for AI safety research: http://t.co/ShWc8F7Kyq http://futureoflife.org/misc/open_letter

1.4K likes1.3K RT158 replies
Aug 26, 2014

Model S limits torque if brake & accel simul pressed. Going to zero torque with brake press would be a safety hazard.

252 likes99 RT62 replies
Nov 19, 2013

What makes this incredibly unjust is that the Model S to date has the best safety record of any car on the road (no injuries or deaths ever)

463 likes583 RT207 replies
Aug 20, 2013

Model S achieves best safety rating of any car ever tested by US govt http://t.co/W1rZ5ceEVX http://www.teslamotors.com/about/press/releases/tesla-model-s-achieves-best-safety-rating-any-car-ever-tested

783 likes1.7K RT331 replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.