The tweet archive.

“Thank you DoubleVerify for correcting your mistake regarding brand safety on this platform. When measured accurately, brand safety on 𝕏 is extremely good.”

“@mayemusk Safety is Tesla’s top priority”

“This article understates the magnitude of the problem – Google interferes to help Democrats thousands of times every election season! This is to be expected when their censorship (aka “Trust & Safety”) teams are have far left political views.”

“@stillgray Absolutely. Even calling it “Safety” is skating on thin ice, but still way better.”

“Exactly. Any organization that puts “Trust” in their name cannot trusted, as that is obviously a euphemism for censorship. We are changing the name of our Trust & Safety group, to simply @Safety. Trust is something that must be earned. The goal of our Safety team is simply to…”

“@EdKrassen Sounds like a good move to ensure safety of the subways (must be a pretty bad situation)”

“@GailAlfarATX @ajtourville I think we should change the name. Imagine if the government had a “Ministry of Trust & Safety”! Orwell would be rofl 🤣”

“Tesla Model Y receives highest possible safety rating”

““Trust & Safety””

“Here is the full text of the bill. It sounds so reasonable at first, just like “The Committee of Public Safety” actually meant “The Cutting Off Heads Committee” in revolutionary France. https://t.co/DCMTHHEIjM https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1177/BILLS-117hr1177ih.pdf”

“When you hear the names of legislation or anything done by the government, it is worth remembering that the group that sent so many people to the guillotine during the French Revolution was called “The Committee of Public Safety”, not the “Cut Off Their Heads Committee”…”

“@ICannot_Enough When unsupervised FSD significantly exceeds human safety levels and is approved by regulators, the numbers will get really crazy!”

“Do you want to fly in an airplane where they prioritized DEI hiring over your safety? That is actually happening.”

“@sobieski902 @TashaARK Supervised FSD is vastly safer than human driving. Unsupervised FSD is trending well. Over time, Version 12 (end-to-end neural nets) will far exceed human safety even when unsupervised.”

“@zachtratar Very important for the public to know why the board felt so strongly about their actions. If it was a matter of AI safety, that would affect all of Earth.”

“@gregg_re Safety of people should be paramount”

“New Tesla safety feature uploaded via over the air software update. Your car just got better while you slept.”

“@ChayaRaichik10 Almost all of it is vestigial. “Trust & Safety”.”

“@Safety CCDH is bronze tier psy ops”

“Please respond to @Safety if you discover issues of concern”

“@alx Sorry it’s taking so long. There are so many layers of “trust & safety” software that it often takes us hours to figure out who, how and why an account was suspended or shadowbanned. A ground up rewrite is underway that simplifies the X codebase dramatically.”

“@dblcapcrimpin @Tesla_AI Ah yes, that is coming. We prioritize safety before convenience.”

“@WSJ If @AlexanderSoros is serious about freedom of speech, then we have common ground. But destroying public safety by electing DAs who won’t prosecute violent criminals needs to stop.”

“@krassenstein We are working on having this information will show up on your profile, so you know exactly what applies to your account. Not as easy as it sounds, because there are many different systems at Twitter that affect accounts, especially in “Trust and Safety” software layer.”

“@netanyahu Thank you for recognizing concerns about safety of digital superintelligence, which affects all of humanity”

“@Scobleizer Tesla is prioritizing safety over comfort for FSD beta. As we become confident in the former, the latter will follow.”

“@krassenstein Regulatory oversight of AI is important to protect the public from companies potentially cutting corners on safety”

“@DirtyTesLa We always prioritize safety over smoothness. After we achieve a higher tier of safety, then we polish the experience. Very important to both both safe and smooth for new users to be comfortable with FSD.”

“@WholeMarsBlog V11.4 is excellent. Several days of driving to random pin drop locations in Austin. Zero safety-critical interventions.”

“Met with @SenSchumer and many members of Congress about artificial intelligence regulation today. That which affects safety of the public has, over time, become regulated to ensure that companies do not cut corners. AI has great power to do good and evil. Better the former.”

“@DirtyTesLa We are gradually reducing it, proportionate to improved safety”

“Summary of argument against AI safety https://t.co/Vmg4yJm22Y”

“@ylecun Actually, airplanes used to crash frequently! Eventually, so many people died that the FAA was created to ensure that commercial aircraft makers & airlines didn’t cut corners on safety. Now, flying on an airliner in America is super safe. https://t.co/WCs2IuMyGb https://www.faa.gov/about/history/brief_history”

“@ylecun @erikbryn Aerospace safety is overseen by the FAA, because people had had enough of dying due to shoddy manufacturing & maintenance, but there is no agency overseeing AI at all.”

“@tegmark Maximum truth-seeking is my best guess for AI safety”

“Microsoft fired their AI safety team? https://t.co/bp5vde1clm https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/amid-bing-chat-controversy-microsoft-cut-an-ai-ethics-team-report-says/”

“@unusual_whales The note is incorrect. There are ~2300 active, working employees at Twitter. There are still hundreds of employees working on trust & safety, along with several thousand contractors. Less than 10 people from my other companies are working at Twitter.”

“@PeterDiamandis AI safety is a real concern! https://t.co/9HpZtAyHIH https://www.newsweek.com/fire-bull-semen-explosion-farm-australia-1459673?amp=1”

“Any account doxxing real-time location info of anyone will be suspended, as it is a physical safety violation. This includes posting links to sites with real-time location info. Posting locations someone traveled to on a slightly delayed basis isn’t a safety problem, so is ok.”

“@jack @Cernovich @annecollier @eirliani @podesta_lesley No, it is not. When Ella Irwin, who now runs Trust & Safety, joined Twitter earlier this year, almost no one was working on child safety. She raised this with Ned & Parag, but they rejected her staffing request. I made it top priority immediately. @ellagirwin”

“@micsolana Absolutely! The real CEO was the head of “Trust & Safety”.”

“@Carnage4Life The safety of any AI system can be measured by its MtH (meantime to Hitler). Microsoft’s Tay chatbot of several years ago got there in ~24 hours.”

“@jordanbpeterson Compared to AI, progress with Neuralink will be slow and easy to assess, as there is large regulatory apparatus approving medical devices. There is no regulatory oversight of AI, which is a *major* problem. I’ve been calling for AI safety regulation for over a decade!”

“@EvaFoxU @Reuters Exactly. The obvious reality, as long-time users know, is that Twitter has failed in trust & safety for a very long time and has interfered in elections. Twitter 2.0 will be far more effective, transparent and even-handed.”

“My commitment to free speech extends even to not banning the account following my plane, even though that is a direct personal safety risk”

“Excellent summary of Twitter’s Trust & Safety from the head of the team”

“@bennyjohnson Absolutely agreed that the Twitter safety board should have people from all viewpoints”

“@yoyoel I recommend following @yoyoel for the most accurate understanding of what’s happening with trust & safety at Twitter”

“@RNRakowitz @wfamarketers @SEP @GerryDAngelo @philsmithisba @Diageo_News @bjankow @kieley_taylor @barone9323 @ajb_sf @meghaley6 Twitter’s commitment to brand safety is unchanged”

“@teslascope @johnkrausphotos Yes, all US & Canada cars with safety scores above 80 should receive an invitation to download FSD Beta by tomorrow”