Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Showing 601-650 from the Supabase archive
Dec 14, 2020

@engineers_feed 🤣

6.3K likes76 RT128 replies
Dec 10, 2020

@Erdayastronaut Yeah, engines did great!

16.1K likes406 RT360 replies
Dec 2, 2020

Much of what people think of an science is actually engineering, eg no such thing as a “rocket scientist”, only rocket engineers. Latter is who put humans on the moon.

35.4K likes1.9K RT1.4K replies
Dec 2, 2020

Science is discovering the essential truths about what exists in the Universe, engineering is about creating things that never existed https://t.co/aIEUtHoPxM https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineer

64.7K likes5.4K RT2.3K replies
Dec 1, 2020

@engineers_feed Paint makes a hell of a difference

14.6K likes164 RT595 replies
Nov 25, 2020

@flcnhvy @thesheetztweetz Many small improvements, but overall similar. Wiring is more robust, engines are more mature, nosecone is sealed better, etc.

2.9K likes66 RT49 replies
Nov 25, 2020

Good Starship SN8 static fire! Aiming for first 15km / ~50k ft altitude flight next week. Goals are to test 3 engine ascent, body flaps, transition from main to header tanks & landing flip.

47.4K likes2.6K RT1.4K replies
Nov 24, 2020

@StarshipFairing @MarcusHouseGame Not bad! We will definitely need more engines if we make the cargo bay all propellant, but it’s probably smarter than a whole new shorter external hull.

1.3K likes30 RT38 replies
Nov 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @rweb11742 The most amazing thing about rocket engines is that they *sometimes* don’t blow up! The amount of power going through them boggles the mind.

5.1K likes188 RT161 replies
Nov 17, 2020

@DJSnM @Erdayastronaut @CharlesNOtrumps @rweb11742 Absolutely. Production/testing of rocket engines is over 90% of the problem. This is true in general. For cars, production is over 99% of the problem. That 1% inspiration is very important, but it’s less than 1% of the pain.

1.7K likes38 RT43 replies
Nov 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @CharlesNOtrumps @rweb11742 Our first Merlin engine design was really bad tbh. Nothing worked well & some parts didn’t work at all. 18 years later & thousands of upgrades make it a great GG cycle engine.

2.3K likes72 RT61 replies
Nov 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @rweb11742 Damn, that’s not easy! I spent quite a bit of time looking at Russian/Ukrainian engines. They’re good.

7.8K likes139 RT134 replies
Nov 13, 2020

@austinbarnard45 Burst disk worked, so vehicle appears to be ok. We’ll have to swap out at least one of the engines.

3.6K likes175 RT141 replies
Nov 13, 2020

@tobyliiiiiiiiii @SpacePadreIsle @austinbarnard45 Maybe melted an engine preburner or fuel hot gas manifold. Whatever it is caused pneumatics loss. We need to design out this problem.

2.8K likes133 RT132 replies
Nov 9, 2020

@teslaownerssv @Tesla Thanks to a lot of great Autopilot/AI hardware & software engineers at Tesla!

2.9K likes114 RT161 replies
Nov 5, 2020

Recruiting ace engineers for Giga Berlin! Will interview in person tomorrow on site. Send resume to 25Guns@Tesla.com.

92.1K likes5.2K RT3.0K replies
Nov 4, 2020

@TechAmazing Einstein was great, but did not succeed at engineering (and he tried)

2.4K likes100 RT247 replies
Nov 3, 2020

@engineers_feed Haha

5.1K likes57 RT107 replies
Nov 2, 2020

@Nigel_Lockyer I could not be more excited about the new supercollider! That said, while it is considerably larger, I don’t think it necessarily requires all that much incremental engineering.

5.5K likes108 RT263 replies
Oct 31, 2020

@MalekKhelifi24 @9inety6Prince @engineers_feed Now we’re talking. Also, Stephenson 2-18 is in the constellation Scrotum haha.

848 likes20 RT41 replies
Oct 25, 2020

@engineers_feed Sigh … there should be a new supersonic jet, this time electric

13.3K likes540 RT716 replies
Oct 21, 2020

@Erdayastronaut Those engines could go 300 bar, but would be dicey. Pushing it for near-term tests doesn’t achieve anything, but I’m confident Raptor will do 300 bar for orbital flights.

2.7K likes124 RT77 replies
Oct 21, 2020

Data from 3 engine Starship static fire this morning looks good. Proceeding with nosecone mate.

38.6K likes1.8K RT1.1K replies
Oct 14, 2020

Will be less roomy with 3 vacuum rocket engines added https://t.co/pKtDFdiZYC

63.1K likes4.0K RT1.4K replies
Oct 12, 2020

@jwangARK Tesla FSD computer’s dual SoCs function like twin engines on planes — they each run different neural nets, so we do get full use of 144 TOPS, but there are enough nets running on each to allow the car to drive to safety if one SoC (or engine in this analogy) fails.

1.4K likes113 RT46 replies
Oct 12, 2020

@electricfuture5 We face a tough dichotomy of applying resources to the old architecture or applying them to the new. It’s not a question of money. If there was a “great engineer” factory, we would place a large order! Unfortunately, great engineers are very rare. This is solved in the FSD build.

8.8K likes256 RT284 replies
Oct 11, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @PelleBrannvall @flcnhvy @Neopork85 @Caspar_Stanley @ErcXspace @MarcusHouseGame @FelixSchlang @C_Bass3d @nickhenning3d @SpaceX There are sensitive elements, but they’re on the inside. Also, a good telephoto lens will be able to capture what I’ve posted. And yeah, anyone who can reverse engineer what I’ve posted doesn’t need to reverse engineer!

2.5K likes98 RT62 replies
Oct 11, 2020

@Teslarati Great work by SpaceX valve engineering & production!

4.4K likes173 RT109 replies
Oct 9, 2020

@TashaARK Additive manufacturing of parts is still far too costly for cars, but can rapidly create tooling to accelerate pace of innovation. It’s already sensible for rocket engine parts. To the best of our knowledge, SpaceX is 2 or 3 years ahead of other companies in use of additive.

4.3K likes264 RT165 replies
Oct 7, 2020

@ICannot_Enough @WholeMarsBlog Sandy Munro understands engineering

2.9K likes169 RT111 replies
Oct 7, 2020

@klod_ua @Erdayastronaut @TrevorMahlmann @johnkrausphotos @Mike_Seeley Cryo pressure test succeeded, but a small leak opened up near the engine mounts, possibly due to differential shrinking

1.2K likes58 RT26 replies
Sep 26, 2020

@ajtourville @MunroAssociates Sandy Munro understands engineering

3.7K likes263 RT125 replies
Sep 25, 2020

@PPathole @Erdayastronaut There are some practical size constraints too. Can’t be too big to fit in the engine compartment. But, it could be a little bigger. 380 sec Isp would be nice.

1.2K likes38 RT26 replies
Sep 25, 2020

@podcastnotes Genetic engineering is too slow unless you use a synthetic virus

918 likes60 RT76 replies
Sep 19, 2020

A prior track record of exceptional achievement in engineering *is* required, but *no* prior experience working on the brain or human physiology is required. We will teach you what’s known about the brain, which is not much tbh.

20.2K likes901 RT1.0K replies
Sep 16, 2020

@engineers_feed At first, I thought that was a parrot

40.0K likes821 RT922 replies
Sep 14, 2020

@engineers_feed Seems like they should make a whole outfit out of that material

10.6K likes276 RT431 replies
Sep 14, 2020

@Erdayastronaut I’m wearing your F-1 engine shirt right now!

11.4K likes272 RT230 replies
Sep 10, 2020

@DisruptResearch Tesla R&D productivity is exceptionally good due to the caliber of engineering talent

1.9K likes134 RT89 replies
Sep 9, 2020

@Teslarati Rawlinson didn’t design Model S. Prototype was done before he joined & he left us in the lurch just as things got tough, which was not cool. He did make some contributions to body/chassis engineering, but not to powertrain, battery, electronics or software.

8.7K likes496 RT339 replies
Sep 9, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @PPathole @SpaceX We’re pretty close to the manufacturing size limit for a milled copper & steel jacket nozzle. Lot of complexity to add a nozzle extension to a sea level engine for small gain. Also hard to fit bigger engine nozzles on the booster.

2.6K likes97 RT84 replies
Sep 5, 2020

@PPathole @SpaceX This is a test engine. Flight articles are fixed with no gimbal.

2.3K likes69 RT55 replies
Aug 30, 2020

@engineers_feed Technically, James Watt measured a pony, added 50% & rounded up haha https://t.co/vnkO0MTrUC https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower

4.7K likes174 RT129 replies
Aug 28, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @flcnhvy @DJSnM Only need 2 engines

3.2K likes102 RT136 replies
Aug 26, 2020

@engineers_feed Astronaughty

14.5K likes425 RT183 replies
Aug 19, 2020

@flcnhvy @Erdayastronaut @nextspaceflight Almost never need to replace whole engine, but some individual parts like turbine wheels need to be replaced over time. Similar to a jet engine.

1.7K likes70 RT53 replies
Aug 19, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @nextspaceflight I don’t want be cavalier, but there isn’t an obvious limit. 100+ flights are possible. Some parts will need to be replaced or upgraded. Cleaning all 9 Merlin turbines is difficult. Raptor is way easier in this regard, despite being a far more complex engine.

3.2K likes186 RT102 replies
Aug 18, 2020

@justpaulinelol @NASASpaceflight That’s engine SN. We’re building SN8 of the ship.

1.6K likes31 RT70 replies
Aug 18, 2020

@NASASpaceflight SN40 is about to be tested & has several upgrades over 330 bar engine. For reference, 330 bar on Raptor produces ~225 tons (half a million pounds) of force.

5.7K likes305 RT176 replies
Aug 18, 2020

Raptor engine just reached 330 bar chamber pressure without exploding! https://t.co/kVKRWksvaB

74.2K likes4.5K RT2.1K replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.