Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Showing 451-500 from the Supabase archive
Apr 16, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @sivanithu @tobyliiiiiiiiii @cabral_psyd @imatsb @thesheetztweetz @SciGuySpace @Some1gee @RocketLab @Peter_J_Beck I have great respect for anyone who gets a rocket to orbit! It’s very hard. I’m spending crazy hours on Starship design/production. It is truly an honor to work with such great engineers. SN4 is almost done 😀

2.5K likes173 RT77 replies
Mar 18, 2020

@SciGuySpace Yeah. There was also an early engine shutdown on ascent, but it didn’t affect orbit insertion. Shows value of having 9 engines! Thorough investigation needed before next mission.

4.4K likes321 RT164 replies
Feb 21, 2020

@flcnhvy @SciGuySpace F9 iteration slowed down as payloads became too important to risk. Little change is expected going forward with F9/FH or Dragon. Starship production & thus iterative improvement will be much faster than Falcon. Driving hard for fully reusable orbital flight this year!

3.6K likes226 RT98 replies
Feb 21, 2020

@SciGuySpace Hardest problem by far is building the production system of something this big. 2nd hardest is achieving full & rapid reuse with payload to orbit of ~2%.

1.7K likes92 RT60 replies
Feb 20, 2020

@pentaquarky @Erdayastronaut The whole nose tip has to have heat shielding for atmospheric entry at Mach 25+ anyway, so is effectively already insulated well in orbit

1.0K likes66 RT44 replies
Feb 14, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @flcnhvy @robert_zubrin Shielding is only needed for orbital speeds

2.1K likes92 RT64 replies
Feb 10, 2020

@yourfavgas Probably 6 months or so. 301 is certainly fine for orbit, but SpaceX 30X will be better.

2.7K likes95 RT71 replies
Feb 7, 2020

@Teslarati @13ericralph31 Unmodified water tower machines do not work well for orbital rockets, as mass efficiency is critical for the latter, but not the former. Hopper, for example, was made of 12.5mm steel vs 4mm for SN1 orbital design. Optimized skins will be <2mm in places across a 9000mm diameter.

2.4K likes144 RT84 replies
Feb 7, 2020

@Teslarati This isn’t quite correct. An orbital rocket needs precision that’s 3X to 4X better than a water tower, so super precise parts, fixtures & welding are needed. Suborbital is much more forgiving.

3.4K likes158 RT91 replies
Jan 29, 2020

@SciGuySpace Tonnage delivered to orbit, normalized to LEO, would be interesting to see

1.4K likes53 RT37 replies
Jan 17, 2020

@jameslin123321 @Erdayastronaut Loading the Mars fleet into Earth orbit, then 1000 ships depart over ~30 days every 26 months. Battlestar Galactica …

7.9K likes468 RT284 replies
Jan 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut Building 100 Starships/year gets to 1000 in 10 years or 100 megatons/year or maybe around 100k people per Earth-Mars orbital sync

4.5K likes392 RT167 replies
Jan 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut Starship design goal is 3 flights/day avg rate, so ~1000 flights/year at >100 tons/flight, so every 10 ships yield 1 megaton per year to orbit

6.4K likes470 RT220 replies
Jan 17, 2020

Megatons per year to orbit are needed for life to become multiplanetary

52.8K likes2.9K RT1.6K replies
Jan 17, 2020

@SPEXcast @SciGuySpace What’s amazing is how non-linear the effect of gravity is. Starship can travel by itself from surface of Mars to surface of Earth, but requires massive booster on Earth with orbital refilling to get to Mars, which is ~38% of Earth gravity.

1.7K likes108 RT65 replies
Jan 16, 2020

Starship orbital vehicle SN1, liquid oxygen header tank & nosecone https://t.co/IaSEdIyZgP

61.5K likes3.5K RT1.1K replies
Jan 15, 2020

@Alejandro_DebH @macshlibber @SpaceflightNow Advancing humanity’s understanding of the Universe is a fundamental motivator for SpaceX! Starship can put giant 🔭 in orbit & on moon. With an occluder, could image 🌏 in other star systems.

1.7K likes133 RT71 replies
Jan 11, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @BocaChicaGal @NASASpaceflight Dome to barrel weld made it to 7.1 bar, which is pretty good as ~6 bar is needed for orbital flight. With more precise parts & better welding conditions, we should reach ~8.5 bar, which is the 1.4 factor of safety needed for crewed flight.

3.8K likes221 RT156 replies
Dec 21, 2019

@NASA @BoeingSpace Orbit is hard. Best wishes for landing & swift recovery to next mission.

9.8K likes468 RT160 replies
Nov 10, 2019

@SciGuySpace @yokem55 @waynehale Without a fully & rapidly reusable orbital rocket, humanity will never be a multiplanet species

1.1K likes85 RT65 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@bluemoondance74 @flcnhvy Raptor is evolving rapidly. Probably wouldn’t consider it to be even V1.0 until roughly engine 50, although probably engines 12+ can be retrofitted for orbital flight, especially on Super Heavy, which is less sensitive to engine variation. It just needs crazy up force!

1.1K likes65 RT31 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@flcnhvy Current global payload to orbit capacity is about 500 tons per year, of which Falcon is about half

798 likes39 RT23 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@flcnhvy If we build as many Starships as Falcons, so ~100 vehicles & each does 100 tons to orbit, that’s a capacity of 10 million tons of payload to orbit per year

1.1K likes81 RT57 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@flcnhvy Payload to orbit per year of Starship fleet is most mind-blowing metric, as it’s designed to fly 3X per day, which is ~1000X per year

1.1K likes91 RT47 replies
Oct 16, 2019

@RationalEtienne @LaurenRow5 @EvaFoxU @JohnnaCrider1 @Kristennetten @vincent13031925 @28delayslater @Sofiaan @hamids @InsideEVs Tesla is first American car company to achieve sustained volume production in past ~100 years. Hardest, most painful thing I’ve ever been through, including getting Falcon to orbit.

3.1K likes368 RT229 replies
Oct 15, 2019

@neiltyson @Space_Station Most people aren’t aware that orbit (and “zero” gravity) is all about horizontal speed, not altitude. A spacecraft needs to travel about 25 times the speed of sound to stay in space.

16.3K likes1.0K RT369 replies
Oct 2, 2019

@justpaulinelol @KeithMansfield @Erdayastronaut If 20km works, then orbit

1.3K likes69 RT81 replies
Sep 10, 2019

Getting ready for flight of orbit-class Starship design

12.0K likes847 RT359 replies
Aug 29, 2019

@JaneidyEve @flcnhvy @Freiraum77 @SpaceX Aiming for 20km flight in Oct & orbit attempt shortly thereafter. Starship update will be on Sept 28th, anniversary of SpaceX reaching orbit. Starship Mk 1 will be fully assembled by that time.

5.5K likes740 RT194 replies
Aug 6, 2019

@Erdayastronaut Race to orbit by both teams, although a success by both in close proximity would be amazing & each would count as a win

2.0K likes87 RT61 replies
Aug 6, 2019

@ShorealoneFilms Vandenberg is great for polar orbits. Will still play an important role long-term, but 80%+ will be eastward.

427 likes19 RT14 replies
Aug 6, 2019

Great progress by Starship Cape team. Started several months behind, but catching up fast. This will be a super fun race to orbit, moon & Mars!

9.3K likes373 RT220 replies
Aug 4, 2019

@SciGuySpace Yes, detailed review of the first orbital Starship, explaining the pros & cons of each design decision

4.1K likes192 RT83 replies
Aug 4, 2019

@EvaFoxU @SpaceX That was our last chance to reach orbit. If it had failed, SpaceX would have died.

19.1K likes854 RT225 replies
Aug 1, 2019

@SciGuySpace Orbital refilling is vital to humanity’s future in space. More likely spacecraft to spacecraft (as aircraft do aerial refueling), than a dedicated depot, at least at first.

2.8K likes166 RT104 replies
Jul 22, 2019

@WorldAndScience @NASA To be clear: good for in-space transit, but not recommended for Earth to orbit!

3.3K likes124 RT104 replies
Jul 22, 2019

@annerajb @highlyaaronic Orbital refilling is critical for high payload to moon or Mars. Initially just Starship to Starship, later dedicated tankers.

741 likes56 RT33 replies
Jul 12, 2019

@joe_mckirdy @13ericralph31 @JHC2718 @StephanieeeeeJ 100mT to 125mT for true useful load to useful orbit (eg Starlink mission), including propellant reserves. 150mT for reference payload compared to other rockets. This is in fully reusable config. About double in fully expendable config, which is hopefully never.

643 likes48 RT19 replies
Jul 11, 2019

The @Space_Station is moving at ~25 times the speed of sound & orbits the Earth every 90 minutes

67.6K likes8.6K RT1.3K replies
Jun 25, 2019

@Matthew_Nolan1 @austinbarnard45 Starship will do orbital launches from Boca Chica (near Brownsville) & Cape

874 likes39 RT26 replies
Jun 24, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @flcnhvy For sure moon 1st, as it’s only 3 days away & u don’t need interplanetary orbital synchronization

3.9K likes147 RT68 replies
May 27, 2019

@Cosmic_Penguin Agreed, sent a note to Starlink team last week specifically regarding albedo reduction. We’ll get a better sense of value of this when satellites have raised orbits & arrays are tracking to sun.

1.1K likes83 RT54 replies
May 27, 2019

@13ericralph31 @varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX If we need to tweak sat orientation to minimize solar reflection during critical astronomical experiments, that’s easily done. Most orbital objects are close to Earth btw, as shown by this NASA density map. https://t.co/83MwIZAEP6 https://t.co/NllMXregRg https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_debris

964 likes104 RT62 replies
May 27, 2019

@varunversion1 @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX There are already 4900 satellites in orbit, which people notice ~0% of the time. Starlink won’t be seen by anyone unless looking very carefully & will have ~0% impact on advancements in astronomy. We need to move telelscopes to orbit anyway. Atmospheric attenuation is terrible. https://t.co/OuWYfNmw0D

1.4K likes173 RT162 replies
May 25, 2019

@SpaceX Krypton thrusters operative, satellites initiating orbit raise every 90 mins

11.3K likes511 RT244 replies
May 24, 2019

@SpaceX Krypton ion thrusters activate in about 3 hours to raise orbit

18.8K likes711 RT314 replies
May 6, 2019

Space is easy, orbit is hard

57.8K likes3.9K RT639 replies
May 6, 2019

@Teslarati .@NASA support for reusability with high reliability, the critical breakthrough for orbital rockets, has made a big difference

4.0K likes182 RT63 replies
Apr 15, 2019

@DannyLaShep With steel membrane wings like a Dragon, we may be able to lower Starship’s orbital reentry temp to ~1000 degrees C, which would allow the whole surface to be uncooled bare metal

5.6K likes330 RT181 replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.