Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Browsing the full local archive fallback (94,952 indexed tweets).
Showing 101-150 of 6,967 matching tweets
Jan 19, 2024

@SciGuySpace His plan makes no sense. Just a worse version of Apollo. Starship will enable a permanently occupied moon base and even a city on the moon one day.

3.0K likes224 RT323 replies
Aug 2, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @SpaceX All correct. Parachutes were originally the backup landing system, with SuperDraco thrusters as primary. Difficulty of proving thruster landing safety *and* architecture being suboptimal for moon/Mars caused us to change focus to parachutes.

4.2K likes167 RT96 replies
Aug 22, 2025

@Erdayastronaut Making a fully reusable orbital rocket of any design is one of the hardest engineering problems of all time. Much, much harder than going to the Moon, which is why it still hasn’t been solved. I am cautiously optimistic that Starship will achieve full reusability next year.

3.0K likes340 RT268 replies
Aug 25, 2025

RT @cb_doge: One took us to the Moon. The other will take us to Mars and beyond. https://t.co/r4iJ3eXrMh

0 likes2.2K RT0 replies
Sep 18, 2021

@BryceSpaceTech Still basically nothing compared to the orbital mass flux needed for a base on moon or Mars

3.7K likes148 RT225 replies
Apr 7, 2021

@DavidWillisSLS @_Jevis_ @PPathole Needs legs for moon & Mars

3.5K likes125 RT230 replies
May 3, 2024

@esherifftv @SciGuySpace Starship will enable a permanently occupied moon base

2.4K likes184 RT177 replies
Oct 13, 2024

@ajtourville @SpaceX The new launch pad is already designed for the 10,000 tons of thrust version, which is almost exactly 3 times more powerful than the Saturn V Moon rocket

2.8K likes206 RT163 replies
Jun 27, 2024

@DJSnM But the Moon Station that Starship will enable will be great

2.8K likes148 RT231 replies
Jan 3, 2025

@peterrhague No, we’re going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction. Mass to orbit is the key metric, thereafter mass to Mars surface. The former needs to be in the megaton to orbit per year range to build a self-sustaining colony on Mars.

1.9K likes222 RT378 replies
Jun 11, 2024

@SciGuySpace I think we can do it. Progress is accelerating. Starship offers a path to far greater payload to the Moon than is currently anticipated in the Artemis program. A permanently crewed Moon base is possible.

2.6K likes198 RT127 replies
Feb 10, 2026

RT @XFreeze: SpaceX will have the first Moon base and it's much closer than most realize Starship can carry the highest tonnage to space o…

0 likes1.8K RT0 replies
Feb 27, 2026

RT @SpaceX: SpaceX shares the same goal as NASA of returning to the Moon with a permanent presence as expeditiously and safely as possible.…

0 likes1.6K RT0 replies
Jul 1, 2021

@Astro_Elliott @LifeboatHQ Once you have rapidly reusable rockets of sufficient size to carry >100 tons of payload, it is not clear that cost per ton to orbit/moon/Mars improves with a larger rocket. Aircraft, for example, have moved away from 747/A380 to 777, which has ~100 tons of payload.

2.6K likes122 RT178 replies
Aug 26, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @dauqhx @universal_sci Starship propellant is ~78% oxygen, so an O2 plant on the moon would be enough. Otherwise, we could brute-force it with tankers to low Earth orbit. That’s probably faster.

2.6K likes138 RT95 replies
Nov 10, 2021

@Tenjin37151 @Space_Station @SpaceX @Commercial_Crew @NASA @esa @JAXA_en @astro_kimbrough @Astro_Megan @Thom_astro @Aki_Hoshide As described in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (great book), a linear accelerator would be great for the moon. Earth’s gravity is too high & atmosphere too dense for accelerators to be a good solution vs reusable boosters imo.

2.4K likes131 RT278 replies
Apr 9, 2016

@levie Tickets to orbital hotels, the moon and Mars will be a lot less than people think.

1.7K likes574 RT73 replies
Dec 5, 2024

@DJSnM The ISS requires a lot of care and feeding. Time to say goodbye and move on to the Moon and Mars.

2.1K likes117 RT229 replies
Jun 1, 2024

@Rothmus Over time, SpaceX will enable anyone to go to space and travel to the moon and Mars

1.9K likes146 RT300 replies
Mar 14, 2024

@SenBillNelson @SpaceX Thank you! We look forward to supporting @NASA in returning American astronauts to the moon.

2.1K likes129 RT104 replies
Dec 9, 2021

@_rykllan @SpaceX @FelixSchlang @MarcusHouse @Erdayastronaut @bluemoondance74 @NextHorizonsSF Rocket fleets grows

2.4K likes72 RT135 replies
Oct 17, 2024

@george_sowers Orbital refilling is essential to get serious tonnage to Mars and Moon

1.8K likes89 RT128 replies
Jul 7, 2020

@nicebit_net @valleyhack If you get past Mars, the asteroids, moons of Jupiter & Saturn, inevitably you reach Uranus!

2.0K likes116 RT242 replies
Feb 10, 2026

RT @tetsuoai: SpaceX just officially shifted its #1 priority to building a self-growing city on the Moon. Not a base. Not an outpost. A cit…

0 likes1.2K RT0 replies
May 4, 2020

@Erdayastronaut @SciGuySpace What’s troubling is that this doesn’t get humanity a base on the moon or even a small crewed Mars mission

2.0K likes83 RT87 replies
Mar 11, 2021

@_Shameless_Plug @Falcon9Block5 @bluemoondance74 @arstechnica @SciGuySpace .@BoredElonMusk

2.0K likes58 RT101 replies
Jan 21, 2024

@ESYudkowsky Our meat computers are feeble (sigh). We did get manage to get a few monkeys to the moon using rockets designed with slide rules, which is pretty impressive.

1.4K likes89 RT165 replies
Oct 14, 2025

RT @SecDuffyNASA: Another major step toward landing Americans on the Moon’s south pole. The progress @SpaceX demonstrated with today's St…

0 likes1.1K RT0 replies
Sep 18, 2018

@sleepingromi @yousuck2020 @rogerwaters @SpaceX @dearmoonproject Yes

2.1K likes50 RT62 replies
May 13, 2018

@Everman SpaceX will prob build 30 to 40 rocket cores for ~300 missions over 5 years. Then BFR takes over & Falcon retires. Goal of BFR is to enable anyone to move to moon, Mars & eventually outer planets.

1.6K likes232 RT98 replies
Nov 22, 2024

@SciGuySpace Starship can also be used to create a large, permanently crewed Moon Base Alpha research station

1.6K likes120 RT103 replies
May 23, 2019

@13ericralph31 @SPEXcast @bluemoondance74 @Orion_Sword @Some1gee @Erdayastronaut @SpaceX After the GoT finale, we dropped it to 6

1.9K likes96 RT52 replies
Jan 14, 2020

@Alejandro_DebH @macshlibber @SpaceflightNow Advancing humanity’s understanding of the Universe is a fundamental motivator for SpaceX! Starship can put giant 🔭 in orbit & on moon. With an occluder, could image 🌏 in other star systems.

1.7K likes133 RT71 replies
Jan 31, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @keego73 Absolutely. You’ve touched on a very important point. The ship must be easy to repair on the moon and Mars.

1.8K likes94 RT75 replies
Apr 17, 2014

Honored that @NASA would entrust @SpaceX with the Apollo 11 (first moon landing) launch pad http://t.co/LmqxRwsKFW http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/april/nasa-signs-agreement-with-spacex-for-use-of-historic-launch-pad/#.U1BNuPldVqw

790 likes567 RT85 replies
Nov 13, 2025

RT @MarioNawfal: ELON: IF EARTH SUCKS, SPACEX IS EXPANDING THE MAP TO "MOON BASE ALPHA" “You can think of space as being concentric shells…

0 likes970 RT0 replies
Jun 13, 2025

RT @Leoatmoon: @Starlink @elonmusk Welcome to the future. https://t.co/AkTTvImolN

0 likes966 RT0 replies
Oct 31, 2025

RT @Truthful_ast: SpaceX’s current large ambitions: -Moon base Alpha on the Moon. -A Mars colony -Data centers in orbit -Starlink V3 bring…

0 likes961 RT0 replies
May 30, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @rmarcilhoo @kimitalvitie @SpaceXNow @ChrisG_NSF @NASASpaceflight Exactly. We’re on the wrong planet for SSTO. No problem on Mars or any of the moons.

1.7K likes52 RT45 replies
Mar 14, 2026

RT @NASAAdmin: Returning to the Moon will prepare us for the grand journey to Mars. If we get this right, we’ll see the Stars and Stripes o…

0 likes899 RT0 replies
Apr 22, 2024

@PhysInHistory Major breakthrough. They used logarithms and slide rules to design the Saturn V moon rocket.

1.2K likes89 RT90 replies
Mar 11, 2020

@SamTalksTesla @JaneidyEve Mars is god of war & memes are a form of war … and fun too! Neither will be destroyed. Ceres, moons of Jupiter & Saturn prob come next.

1.4K likes111 RT80 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@AstrumMining @SPEXcast @McMurchie @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX Moon first, Mars as soon as the planets align

1.5K likes87 RT66 replies
Feb 10, 2025

RT @teslaownersSV: “Starship is capable of building a city on Mars and a city on the moon. That's what it's designed to do. But we're being…

0 likes816 RT0 replies
May 6, 2025

@gork @Crypto_Moon369 @Starlink 💞

904 likes85 RT287 replies
Jun 26, 2019

@bluemoondance74 @SptlightVids @SpaceX Working on Tesla global logistics

1.4K likes50 RT86 replies
May 8, 2020

@raytech247 @flcnhvy @Erdayastronaut @ValkyrieBaron11 @NASASpaceflight Yes, mostly because you can use the ship every week going to the moon instead of every two years for Mars (best case)

1.4K likes58 RT59 replies
Apr 16, 2020

@sivanithu @tobyliiiiiiiiii @cabral_psyd @Erdayastronaut @imatsb @thesheetztweetz @SciGuySpace @Some1gee @RocketLab Some of the small launcher activity is cool, especially @rocketlab. Downsides are helicopter retrieval doesn’t scale to bigger rockets & is highly weather-dependent. Also, propulsive landing is needed for moon/Mars. That said, it’s probably right move for small LEO vehicle.

1.4K likes58 RT28 replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.