Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Browsing the full local archive fallback (94,952 indexed tweets).
Showing 6,251-6,300 of 6,967 matching tweets
Feb 22, 2019

@SpaceXUpdates Crew Dragon high altitude abort test

962 likes58 RT52 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@DJSnM @DanAloni @Kell31213876 @Vadim15258417 @Erdayastronaut @sasor098 @AdamHugo @WayCharMar @fan_of_racing @bkent136 @macodiseas @katlinegrey Advanced, reusable rockets are all we need to become a multiplanet civilization. Once we have a city on Mars, interplanetary travel will create a forcing function for vast improvements in spaceflight.

1.8K likes150 RT104 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@benoitdenayer @navincho @katlinegrey Essentially, yes. Great engineering talent, but should focus on reusable rockets for purpose of a permanent human base on the moon and self-sustaining city on Mars.

631 likes26 RT30 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@katlinegrey SpaceX commercial 🚀 launch market share went from 0% in 2010 to 65% in 2018. Despite massive subsidies to Boeing/Lockeed, they have never won a fair competition against SpaceX for several years. https://t.co/sqAYCCcJtd

1.8K likes182 RT59 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@martinengwicht @macodiseas @katlinegrey Exactly. That’s the critical point for Starship/BFR: more payload than the biggest rocket ever made, but for less money per launch than the smallest (orbital) rocket. Without something that lowers orbital flight cost by 100X, humanity will never be a multiplanet species.

1.0K likes91 RT41 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@fan_of_racing @bkent136 @macodiseas @katlinegrey SpaceX Merlin architecture is simpler than staged combustion (eg SSME or RD), but it has world record for thrust/weight & thrust/cost engine. Raptor has better Isp, but I’m worried it may fall short on those two critical metrics.

1.1K likes61 RT24 replies
Feb 21, 2019

@katlinegrey I have been chief engineer/designer at SpaceX from day 1. Had I been better, our first 3 launches might have succeeded, but I learned from those mistakes. https://t.co/3r6ZqEc30A https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/07/as-the-spacex-steamroller-surges-european-rocket-industry-vows-to-resist/3/

8.8K likes530 RT239 replies
Feb 17, 2019

@FredericLambert @georgezachary I had to focus on solving a painfully large number of engineering & manufacturing problems at Tesla (especially) & SpaceX

1.7K likes64 RT48 replies
Feb 16, 2019

SpaceX foundry casting Raptor engine manifold out of Inconel https://t.co/zWlqNwGj0R

109.0K likes8.1K RT1.6K replies
Feb 13, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @John_Gardi @w0lfyxD @Robotbeat @SpaceX Yeah, but simpler. Needed for landing burn or engines will suck in a bubble.

1.3K likes39 RT38 replies
Feb 13, 2019

@John_Gardi @w0lfyxD @Robotbeat @SpaceX Starship & Super Heavy will press tanks autogenously even in version 1. Very important, as helium costs more than oxygen on Falcon, even though liquid oxygen is 2/3 vehicle mass & helium weighs basically nothing.

1.2K likes69 RT41 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@John_Gardi @w0lfyxD @Robotbeat @SpaceX True

1.0K likes23 RT39 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@AstrumMining @SPEXcast @McMurchie @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX Moon first, Mars as soon as the planets align

1.5K likes87 RT66 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@SPEXcast @ikrbkv @MARINAVALOVA2 @alexmd2 @SpaceX On my bedside table

786 likes15 RT32 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@ikrbkv @MARINAVALOVA2 @alexmd2 @SpaceX A biography on Korolev has center place in my study

850 likes36 RT27 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@SPEXcast @McMurchie @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX Just planning on keeping the public informed about progress & setbacks. Will be some RUDs along the way, but excitement is guaranteed!

1.7K likes84 RT54 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@McMurchie @SPEXcast @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX The goodwill of the public is critical to Starship’s success

1.5K likes79 RT50 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@epoxy101 @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX At least 10X cheaper

815 likes31 RT26 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@SPEXcast @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX Very dependent on volume, but I’m confident moving to Mars (return ticket is free) will one day cost less than $500k & maybe even below $100k. Low enough that most people in advanced economies could sell their home on Earth & move to Mars if they want.

2.8K likes378 RT286 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@SpaceXFan97 @Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX Yes

590 likes12 RT17 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@Robotbeat @John_Gardi @SpaceX This will sound implausible, but I think there’s a path to build Starship / Super Heavy for less than Falcon 9

1.8K likes167 RT78 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@13ericralph31 @John_Gardi @SpaceX Close

492 likes14 RT9 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@John_Gardi @SpaceX But not an extendable nozzle though, as that just saves length. Nozzle diameter is limited by body diameter.

868 likes36 RT34 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@SpaceXFan97 @alexmd2 @SpaceX Much above 300 bar main chamber pressure means extreme oxygen preburner pressure of 700 to 800+ bar. Definitely pushing the limit of known physics.

2.7K likes99 RT55 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@_cgp @SpaceX Propellant was not deep cryo. CH4 & O2 were just barely below liquid temp at 1 bar. In theory, Raptor should do ~300 bar at deep cryo, provided everything holds together, which is far from certain. However, only 250 bar is needed for nominal operation of Starship/Super Heavy.

973 likes62 RT25 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@John_Gardi @SpaceX Yes, aiming for 380 sec Isp with vac nozzle. Maybe 382 if we get lucky.

1.6K likes69 RT32 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@13ericralph31 @SpaceX I think 6 where we lit main chamber & several with only preburners

1.0K likes24 RT24 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@johnkrausphotos @SpaceX About 11 secs

1.1K likes32 RT39 replies
Feb 11, 2019

@alexmd2 @SpaceX Definitely! It’s amazing that the RD-170 & RD-180 engines held the record for so many decades. Excellent engineering.

2.3K likes83 RT29 replies
Feb 11, 2019

Raptor reached 268.9 bar today, exceeding prior record held by the awesome Russian RD-180. Great work by @SpaceX engine/test team! https://t.co/yPrvO0JhyY

64.5K likes3.2K RT1.9K replies
Feb 10, 2019

@rocketisfine @leo190102 I was simply too sexy for it https://t.co/vugJLyZVjI https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P5mtclwloEQ

4.5K likes152 RT113 replies
Feb 8, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @LytovchenkoSerg @John_Gardi Booster center of mass is much lower & more consistent (no payload mass to consider), so still biases towards engine first entry

1.3K likes45 RT36 replies
Feb 8, 2019

@LytovchenkoSerg @John_Gardi @Erdayastronaut Rocket booster temperatures won’t go much above 600 Kelvin on hottest parts of main body & maybe around 1200K on base, which uncooled steel can handle. Starship is around 1700K for a Mach 25 entry, so needs shielding of some kind.

878 likes43 RT22 replies
Feb 7, 2019

@Malcolmmarsman @Erdayastronaut Prob wise for version 1 to have legs or we will frag a lot of launch pads

1.3K likes40 RT43 replies
Feb 7, 2019

@Erdayastronaut The Super Heavy booster is only needed on Earth, so think of this as just “Starship” & sometimes it needs a boost, hence Super Heavy

2.1K likes105 RT106 replies
Feb 7, 2019

🔥🖤 SpaceX Engineering 🖤🔥

45.8K likes2.2K RT720 replies
Feb 7, 2019

Raptor just achieved power level needed for Starship & Super Heavy https://t.co/NcqnAVWc35

224.7K likes16.9K RT5.7K replies
Feb 6, 2019

@SpaceX https://t.co/sO2s0OcM4L https://www.whereisroadster.com/charts/

10.6K likes996 RT299 replies
Feb 4, 2019

@jclishman @dguisinger @Erdayastronaut @DanielDavisA Will do, although SpaceX reddit is very well-informed. Really impressive analysis by some commenters.

1.2K likes46 RT28 replies
Feb 4, 2019

First firing of Starship Raptor flight engine! So proud of great work by @SpaceX team!! https://t.co/S6aT7Jih4S

146.9K likes15.8K RT2.2K replies
Feb 3, 2019

At @SpaceX Texas with engineering team getting ready to fire new Raptor rocket engine https://t.co/ACFM8AtY8w

41.4K likes2.4K RT1.3K replies
Feb 1, 2019

@Archin50001 @AlexTheChemist @SpaceX Dammit! 😀

2.2K likes38 RT27 replies
Feb 1, 2019

@AlexTheChemist @SpaceX Well, my past mistakes do seem extremely dumb, especially the ones where I mistakenly thought I was smart

3.1K likes210 RT85 replies
Feb 1, 2019

@nickynaptime Rocket mass ratio is about the same for aluminum-lithium vs 301 stainless full hard at cryo, but latter costs way less, is tougher & doesn’t even need paint!

664 likes30 RT24 replies
Feb 1, 2019

@SpaceXFan97 @wonderofscience @Treebeard1671 @Erdayastronaut @keego73 Still up to 31. Will probably fly with fewer initially in case it blows up.

982 likes30 RT31 replies
Feb 1, 2019

Initially making one 200 metric ton thrust engine common across ship & booster to reach the moon as fast as possible. Next versions will split to vacuum-optimized (380+ sec Isp) & sea-level thrust optimized (~250 ton).

19.9K likes1.0K RT635 replies
Feb 1, 2019

Preparing to fire the Starship Raptor engine at @SpaceX Texas https://t.co/8JCOi1BG6z

52.7K likes5.0K RT1.3K replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.