Menu
Deep ResearchPROAsk Elon
Elon Musk · Tweet Archive

The tweet archive.

15 years of Elon, fully searchable. The production archive uses Supabase as the source of truth, with 94,952 indexed tweets available in development as a full-archive fallback and a curated annotation layer for context, theory, and how major claims aged.

Browsing the full local archive fallback (94,952 indexed tweets).
Showing 5,901-5,950 of 6,967 matching tweets
Jan 17, 2020

@Erdayastronaut Starship design goal is 3 flights/day avg rate, so ~1000 flights/year at >100 tons/flight, so every 10 ships yield 1 megaton per year to orbit

6.4K likes470 RT220 replies
Jan 16, 2020

@SPEXcast @SciGuySpace What’s amazing is how non-linear the effect of gravity is. Starship can travel by itself from surface of Mars to surface of Earth, but requires massive booster on Earth with orbital refilling to get to Mars, which is ~38% of Earth gravity.

1.7K likes108 RT65 replies
Jan 16, 2020

@SPEXcast @SciGuySpace Densification isn’t needed to return the ship & limited cargo from Mars, but it’s an option for increasing cargo return capability if needed

1.1K likes50 RT19 replies
Jan 16, 2020

@SciGuySpace Fundamental issue with SLS is that it’s not reusable, which means that a billion dollar rocket is blown up every launch! 💯 tragedy.

3.0K likes263 RT142 replies
Jan 16, 2020

Starship orbital vehicle SN1, liquid oxygen header tank & nosecone https://t.co/IaSEdIyZgP

61.5K likes3.5K RT1.1K replies
Jan 14, 2020

@Alejandro_DebH @macshlibber @SpaceflightNow Advancing humanity’s understanding of the Universe is a fundamental motivator for SpaceX! Starship can put giant 🔭 in orbit & on moon. With an occluder, could image 🌏 in other star systems.

1.7K likes133 RT71 replies
Jan 14, 2020

@Alejandro_DebH @macshlibber @SpaceflightNow Exactly. We’ve had good discussions with leading astronomers. One way or another, we’ll make sure Starlink doesn’t inhibit new discoveries or change the character of the night sky.

1.3K likes101 RT43 replies
Jan 12, 2020

@bluemoondance74 @flcnhvy @SpaceX Should be able to post video of Raptor on Tripod soon

1.1K likes52 RT21 replies
Jan 12, 2020

@flcnhvy @nextspaceflight @SmileSimplify @SpaceX Ok, tho could be gnarly

1.7K likes45 RT38 replies
Jan 12, 2020

@nextspaceflight @SmileSimplify @SpaceX Destroyed in Dragon fire

2.2K likes82 RT88 replies
Jan 12, 2020

@SmileSimplify @SpaceX We tried to design a way to save B1046, but not possible 😞

1.9K likes64 RT64 replies
Jan 10, 2020

@RQuiddich Every tank under pressure is a balloon tank — it’s just question of degree. Starship tanks are not balloon tanks like Atlas in sense that they don’t collapse when depressurized on the ground.

1.2K likes45 RT38 replies
Jan 7, 2020

@annerajb @waitbutwhy Looks like a thin, flat, round UFO on a stick. Starlink Terminal has motors to self-adjust optimal angle to view sky. Instructions are simply: - Plug in socket - Point at sky These instructions work in either order. No training required.

2.5K likes219 RT203 replies
Jan 7, 2020

@flcnhvy Sprockets was amazing

1.6K likes47 RT44 replies
Jan 1, 2020

Congratulations Tesla & SpaceX on great 2019! You rock!! Looking forward to epic 2020 ♥️🚀🛰🚘☀️

136.8K likes6.3K RT1.7K replies
Dec 30, 2019

@Teslarati Hard to believe it’s almost time to retire Cargo Dragon after a decade of solid service

3.0K likes132 RT83 replies
Dec 30, 2019

@EverydayTesla Yeah, engineering is ~90% of my time at SpaceX & about ~60% at Tesla

1.8K likes100 RT55 replies
Dec 30, 2019

@Kristennetten @SmileSimplify @Erdayastronaut We’re focusing on Boca right now for Starship & Cape is focused on Falcon/Dragon

701 likes43 RT22 replies
Dec 30, 2019

Almost three now. Boca team is crushing it! Starship has giant dome 🤣🤣 https://t.co/qTN2TU02pb

24.7K likes1.0K RT410 replies
Dec 30, 2019

@realRickyReeves @Erdayastronaut @NASA Crew Dragon is capable of propulsive landing, but would require extensive testing to prove safety. Better to focus on Starship.

851 likes47 RT19 replies
Dec 30, 2019

@kulpability @NASA Crew Dragon should be physically ready & at the Cape in Feb, but completing all safety reviews will probably take a few more months

3.3K likes175 RT68 replies
Dec 30, 2019

Simulation of first crewed flight of Falcon 9 / Dragon 2020 @NASA https://t.co/BSDPYTcVIG

121.2K likes17.0K RT3.5K replies
Dec 28, 2019

@JaneidyEve We’re now building flight design of Starship SN1, but each SN will have at least minor improvements, at least through SN20 or so of Starship V1.0.

1.8K likes154 RT47 replies
Dec 27, 2019

Was up all night with SpaceX team working on Starship tank dome production (most difficult part of primary structure). Dawn arrives … https://t.co/SzyDSYUYOu

89.4K likes5.1K RT1.8K replies
Dec 22, 2019

@TechnologicAli Started Zip2 with ~$2k & ~$100k of student debt, rolled proceeds into X/PayPal, rolled proceeds again into SpaceX/Tesla, but these are all companies where I played fundamental founding role. Not right to ask others to put in money if I don’t put in mine.

10.5K likes701 RT142 replies
Dec 22, 2019

If Tesla & SpaceX go bankrupt, so will I. As it should be.

109.9K likes6.1K RT1.6K replies
Dec 17, 2019

@SpaceX Telemetry indicates soft touchdown on the water, so fairing might still be reusable

10.6K likes276 RT326 replies
Dec 14, 2019

@bluemoondance74 @ThugsAndMiracle @tfspeakcies @DearHistorians @DeepintoHistory @HellenisticPod @TrueConsPod @IWBpodcast @Coffincast @CacheHistory @AgeofVictoria @ForYourRefPod @WWIIPodcast @namelessdeadpod @ZombieFishbowl @AgeofNapoleon Raptor is making great progress! Just finished an engineering review with SpaceX Propulsion. Engine SN 17 is about to ship to McGregor with some holiday style 🎄😀 https://t.co/3JNIyxY9H0

6.0K likes585 RT177 replies
Dec 10, 2019

@justpaulinelol Maybe on Starship? It’s def got the payload capacity …

6.0K likes230 RT227 replies
Dec 10, 2019

@MemesOfMars @latimes @latimesfood @latimesbooks @latimesphotos @alex_avoigt @JaneidyEve @sara_boutall @RationalEtienne @ICannot_Enough @LaurenRow5 Just wish Russ Mitchell would improve the *quality* of his fiction. Is this too much to ask!?

1.2K likes91 RT151 replies
Dec 7, 2019

@neiltyson If we create a city on Mars, Earth-Mars travel will be a powerful forcing function for inventing something like warp drive

60.9K likes3.3K RT1.4K replies
Dec 4, 2019

Launching third flight of this Dragon spacecraft to @Space_Station tomorrow

28.0K likes1.7K RT570 replies
Nov 24, 2019

@flcnhvy Starship steel decision came first. We were going to use titanium skins for Cybertruck, but cold-rolled 30X stainless is much stronger.

6.5K likes222 RT122 replies
Nov 20, 2019

@Erdayastronaut @SpaceX Absolutely, but to move to Mk3 design. This had some value as a manufacturing pathfinder, but flight design is quite different.

4.3K likes242 RT231 replies
Nov 11, 2019

Starlink vertical on the pad https://t.co/WuiB1piKcK

65.2K likes5.0K RT892 replies
Nov 10, 2019

@SciGuySpace @yokem55 @waynehale Without a fully & rapidly reusable orbital rocket, humanity will never be a multiplanet species

1.1K likes85 RT65 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@bluemoondance74 @flcnhvy SpaceX engine production is gearing up to build about a Raptor a day by next year, so up to 365 engines per year. Most will be the (as high as) 300 ton thrust (but no throttle & no gimbal) variant for Super Heavy. Cumulative thrust/year could thus be as high as 100,000 tons/year.

835 likes83 RT38 replies
Nov 8, 2019

@teslaownersSV @flcnhvy No, in the beginning, assuming you even make it there alive, Mars will be far more dangerous & difficult than Earth & take decades of hard labor to make self-sufficient. That’s the sales pitch. Want to go?

1.2K likes110 RT177 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@teslaownersSV @flcnhvy So it will take about 20 years to transfer a million tons to Mars Base Alpha, which is hopefully enough to make it sustainable

1.2K likes94 RT86 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@teslaownersSV @flcnhvy A thousand ships will be needed to create a sustainable Mars city

850 likes77 RT43 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@Malcolmmarsman @flcnhvy No problem. We could program Starship to perform Swan Lake in the sky. Minimizing landing burn propellant mass is what’s hard.

967 likes68 RT42 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@flcnhvy Current global payload to orbit capacity is about 500 tons per year, of which Falcon is about half

798 likes39 RT23 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@flcnhvy If we build as many Starships as Falcons, so ~100 vehicles & each does 100 tons to orbit, that’s a capacity of 10 million tons of payload to orbit per year

1.1K likes81 RT57 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@flcnhvy Payload to orbit per year of Starship fleet is most mind-blowing metric, as it’s designed to fly 3X per day, which is ~1000X per year

1.1K likes91 RT47 replies
Nov 7, 2019

@flcnhvy The economics have to be something like that to build a self-sustaining city on Mars

1.9K likes85 RT42 replies
Nov 4, 2019

@TJ_Cooney That said, most Starship spaceports will probably need to be ~20 miles / 30km offshore for acceptable noise levels, especially for frequent daily flights, as would occur for point to point flights on Earth

2.0K likes130 RT132 replies
First Principles AI
First Principles AI
Ask anything about Elon
5 free

Ask anything about Elon — companies, predictions, tweets, controversies, vehicles, family.